Setups ranked by what you’d actually keep: net APY after estimated fees and slippage, sized to the notional you pick — across venues most aggregators don’t track. Annualized rates only on proven funding intervals; gaps stay labeled gaps.
Open the full Funding workbench → Per-venue funding, interval proof and persistence detail. Only venues with a proven interval and trusted-or-collector-fresh funding are compared.
Track the markets you care about and get a heads-up when a setup appears — e.g. “SOL funding above 50% annualized on a trusted venue.”
Dry-run only — nothing is sent; no account or wallet.
An annualized rate appears only when a venue’s funding cadence is proven from its own data. Unproven interval → the APY is suppressed, visibly — never guessed.
Setup economics are sized to the notional you pick on the Funding workbench. Fees and slippage are labeled estimates today — the book depth our collectors already capture is being wired into them.
A number a venue doesn’t report stays “—”. Nothing is zero-filled, interpolated, or scraped from a third party.
Funding, open interest and book depth on these venues, captured by our own collectors — months before most started tracking them. History like that can’t be backfilled by anyone who wasn’t recording.
Where the size and activity sit, by venue — 24h volume and open interest summed across each venue’s markets.
| Venue | 24h volume | Open interest | Maker fee | Taker fee |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| hyperliquid hyperliquid | — | $3.69B | — | — |
| dydx dydx | — | $61.3M | — | — |
| extended extended | — | $44.2M | — | — |
| aster aster | — | — | — | — |
| edgex edgex | — | — | — | — |
| grvt grvt | — | — | — | — |
| lighter lighter | — | — | — | — |
| pacifica pacifica | — | — | — | — |
| paradex paradex | — | — | — | — |
Maker / taker fees aren’t surfaced through the data layer yet — shown as a gap, never invented.